Expert review of PAR planning documents to assess two forms of coherence: • between different PAR planning documents (when there is only one PAR planning document, there must be coherence between chapters); • between PAR planning documents and the government’s legislative plans (government work programme and/or legislative plan). Different PAR planning documents (or chapters if there is only one strategy) are considered incoherent if at least two clear cases of any of the following problems are identified: • Their objectives and measures are directly contradictory; • Clear differences in ambition levels (such as different target values) are indicated; • Different deadlines are stipulated for completing the same measure or activity; • Different institutions have been designated as responsible for the same task. Only PAR planning documents with overlapping periods of implementation will be reviewed and compared. PAR planning documents are considered not to be coherent with the legislative plan if more than one law specified in the PAR planning documents is not included in the government’s legislative plan. The assessment is done by comparing the plans made for the ongoing calendar year. Two points are awarded for each of the two criteria for coherence which are met (total of 4 points): • PAR planning documents are coherent, with no more than one inconsistency identified; • PAR planning documents are coherent with the legislative plans of the government, with no more than one law omitted.