Quality of public administration reform (PAR) agenda
The government is expected to ensure a strategic vision and leadership for an agile, innovative, and continuously improving public administration that is responsive to new challenges. This indicator measures that the policy and institutional frameworks for PAR agenda planning, management, monitoring and reporting are established and how they are implemented in practice.
| ALB | BIH | XKV | MNE | MKD | SRB | AVG | BEST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 50 | 81.3 | 25 | 50 | 25 | 46.9 | 81.3 |
Quality of public administration reform (PAR) agenda – at a glance
Average indicator values are presented for each area and administration. Click on the rows and columns to sort the table by highest value.
Category Performance
Each criterion belongs to one of five categories: 1) legislation, 2) strategy and guidance, 3) institutional set-up, 4) practice in implementation, and 5) results. The charts below show how the selected administration is performing in each category. The points received by the administration in each category during the assessment are divided by the total points that can be achieved in each category.
Compare performance
Pick a country and year above, and use the menu below to sort indicator values based on best or worst performance. Compare against the regional average, the best performer and past performance (if available).
Subindicators
List of subindicators within Quality of public administration reform (PAR) agenda.
Prioritisation of PAR in key horizontal planning documents
Scope and comprehensiveness of PAR agenda
Reported implementation rate of PAR agenda
Management and co-ordination of PAR agenda
Monitoring implementation of PAR agenda
Stakeholder involvement and communication
Promotion of innovative practices