Effectiveness of the Centre-of-government (CoG), policy co-ordination and government decision-making
| ALB | BIH | XKV | MNE | MKD | SRB | AVG | BEST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.9 | 77.8 | 88.9 | 83.3 | 88.9 | 83.3 | 85.2 | 88.9 |
Effectiveness of the Centre-of-government (CoG), policy co-ordination and government decision-making – at a glance
Average indicator values are presented for each area and administration. Click on the rows and columns to sort the table by highest value.
Category Performance
Each criterion belongs to one of five categories: 1) legislation, 2) strategy and guidance, 3) institutional set-up, 4) practice in implementation, and 5) results. The charts below show how the selected administration is performing in each category. The points received by the administration in each category during the assessment are divided by the total points that can be achieved in each category.
Compare performance
Pick a country and year above, and use the menu below to sort indicator values based on best or worst performance. Compare against the regional average, the best performer and past performance (if available).
Subindicators
List of subindicators within Effectiveness of the Centre-of-government (CoG), policy co-ordination and government decision-making.
Assignment of critical functions to CoG institutions by legislation
Internal co‑ordination between CoG institutions
Preparation of government sessions and openness of decision making
Central quality check on procedural compliance
Co-ordination of government communications
Co-ordination of risk and crisis management
Assignment of EI-functions to CoG institutions by legislation
Availability of guidelines on EI processes
Effectiveness of EI co-ordination in practice