Quality of policy planning and reporting
| ALB | BIH | XKV | MNE | MKD | SRB | AVG | BEST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71.4 | 64.3 | 85.7 | 92.9 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 100 |
Quality of policy planning and reporting – at a glance
Average indicator values are presented for each area and administration. Click on the rows and columns to sort the table by highest value.
Category Performance
Each criterion belongs to one of five categories: 1) legislation, 2) strategy and guidance, 3) institutional set-up, 4) practice in implementation, and 5) results. The charts below show how the selected administration is performing in each category. The points received by the administration in each category during the assessment are divided by the total points that can be achieved in each category.
Compare performance
Pick a country and year above, and use the menu below to sort indicator values based on best or worst performance. Compare against the regional average, the best performer and past performance (if available).
Subindicators
List of subindicators within Quality of policy planning and reporting.
Adequacy of the legislative and institutional framework for policy planning and reporting
Availability of guidance to line ministries during the policy planning and reporting process
Availability of guidance to line ministries during the policy planning and reporting process
Alignment between central policy planning documents
Quality and transparency of policy planning documents
Financial sustainability of policy planning documents
Implementation of government commitments
Quality and transparency of policy reporting and monitoring
Quality and transparency of European integration (EI) policy planning
Implementation of European integration (EI) commitments
Quality and transparency of EI monitoring and reporting