Use of evidence and impact assessment during policy making, and quality and accessibility of laws

Strength of the national policy framework for better regulation

ALB	BIH	XKV	MNE	MKD	SRB	AVG	BEST
100	76.7	100	100	66.7	100	90.6	100

Use of evidence and impact assessment during policy making, and quality and accessibility of laws – at a glance

Average indicator values are presented for each area and administration. Click on the rows and columns to sort the table by highest value.

Category Performance

Each criterion belongs to one of five categories: 1) legislation, 2) strategy and guidance, 3) institutional set-up, 4) practice in implementation, and 5) results. The charts below show how the selected administration is performing in each category. The points received by the administration in each category during the assessment are divided by the total points that can be achieved in each category.

Compare performance

Pick a country and year above, and use the menu below to sort indicator values based on best or worst performance. Compare against the regional average, the best performer and past performance (if available).

Subindicators

List of subindicators within Use of evidence and impact assessment during policy making, and quality and accessibility of laws.

Strength of the national policy framework for better regulation

Effectiveness of internal co-ordination and procedures for evidence-based policymaking in ministries

Comprehensiveness of the regulatory impact assessment (RIA) system, and consistency and quality of implementation

Effectiveness of regulatory oversight, central guidance and support for RIA

Predictability, coherence and consistency of legislation

Accessibility and availability of laws

Effectiveness of the regulatory framework and special procedures and tools for evidence-based EU law transposition

Links

Explore additional resources on public administration reform.

Policy development and co-ordination