Professional top managers
| ALB | BIH | XKV | MNE | MKD | SRB | AVG | BEST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.5 | 57.3 | 54.5 | 72.7 | 0 | 72.7 | 52 | 72.7 |
Professional top managers – at a glance
Average indicator values are presented for each area and administration. Click on the rows and columns to sort the table by highest value.
Category Performance
Each criterion belongs to one of five categories: 1) legislation, 2) strategy and guidance, 3) institutional set-up, 4) practice in implementation, and 5) results. The charts below show how the selected administration is performing in each category. The points received by the administration in each category during the assessment are divided by the total points that can be achieved in each category.
Compare performance
Pick a country and year above, and use the menu below to sort indicator values based on best or worst performance. Compare against the regional average, the best performer and past performance (if available).
Subindicators
List of subindicators within Professional top managers.
A specific category and scope of the Top Public Management (TPM) system
Attractiveness of top management positions
Merit-based and competitive recruitment of top managers
Diversity and gender parity in top management positions
Management by objectives and performance evaluation
Managerial autonomy
Training and professional development
Stability of top managers