Attractiveness of employment and work conditions
| ALB | BIH | XKV | MNE | MKD | SRB | AVG | BEST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57 | 19 | 32 | 13 | 50.5 | 55 | 37.8 | 57 |
Attractiveness of employment and work conditions – at a glance
Average indicator values are presented for each area and administration. Click on the rows and columns to sort the table by highest value.
Category Performance
Each criterion belongs to one of five categories: 1) legislation, 2) strategy and guidance, 3) institutional set-up, 4) practice in implementation, and 5) results. The charts below show how the selected administration is performing in each category. The points received by the administration in each category during the assessment are divided by the total points that can be achieved in each category.
Compare performance
Pick a country and year above, and use the menu below to sort indicator values based on best or worst performance. Compare against the regional average, the best performer and past performance (if available).
Subindicators
List of subindicators within Attractiveness of employment and work conditions.
Attractiveness of employment in public administration
Fairness in the allocation of base salaries and allowances
Predictability of the wage budget of the public service
Availability and transparency of salary information
Salary progression opportunities
Performance-related pay and other incentives
Work conditions and well-being of public servants
Availability of flexible work arrangements
Social dialogue with the public sector employees