Professional development and performance management of public servants
| ALB | BIH | XKV | MNE | MKD | SRB | AVG | BEST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62.4 | 40 | 37.1 | 21.9 | 46.7 | 58.6 | 44.4 | 62.4 |
Professional development and performance management of public servants – at a glance
Average indicator values are presented for each area and administration. Click on the rows and columns to sort the table by highest value.
Category Performance
Each criterion belongs to one of five categories: 1) legislation, 2) strategy and guidance, 3) institutional set-up, 4) practice in implementation, and 5) results. The charts below show how the selected administration is performing in each category. The points received by the administration in each category during the assessment are divided by the total points that can be achieved in each category.
Compare performance
Pick a country and year above, and use the menu below to sort indicator values based on best or worst performance. Compare against the regional average, the best performer and past performance (if available).
Subindicators
List of subindicators within Professional development and performance management of public servants.
Professionalism of performance assessment
Existence of training plans adapted to government priorities
Implementation and results of training
Regulation and use of horizontal mobility
Professionalism of vertical promotion
Support of professional development practices for diversity and inclusion