The organisation and management of public administration foster accountability, effectiveness and efficiency
| ALB | BIH | XKV | MNE | MKD | SRB | AVG | BEST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 18 | 25 | 100 | 10 | 20 | 32.2 | 100 |
The organisation and management of public administration foster accountability, effectiveness and efficiency – at a glance
Average indicator values are presented for each area and administration. Click on the rows and columns to sort the table by highest value.
Category Performance
Each criterion belongs to one of five categories: 1) legislation, 2) strategy and guidance, 3) institutional set-up, 4) practice in implementation, and 5) results. The charts below show how the selected administration is performing in each category. The points received by the administration in each category during the assessment are divided by the total points that can be achieved in each category.
Compare performance
Pick a country and year above, and use the menu below to sort indicator values based on best or worst performance. Compare against the regional average, the best performer and past performance (if available).
Subindicators
List of subindicators within The organisation and management of public administration foster accountability, effectiveness and efficiency.
Clarity and coherence of official typology of central government bodies
Effective mechanisms for keeping the organisation of public administration rational
Strength of basic accountability mechanisms between ministries and subordinated bodies
Strength of the accountability framework for promoting performance
Number of public bodies subordinated to the parliament
Autonomy of regulatory bodies according to the legislation
Effective internal organisation
Effective performance of public administration
Delegation of decision-making authority within ministries
Horizontal co-ordination in PAR areas
Use of Total Quality Management (TQM) tools
Level of focus on reducing the environmental footprint of public administration bodies