Effective performance of public administration

Composite of performance metrics in PAR areas (%)

The composite is based on the following sub-indicators/criteria: - Sub-indicator 1.1.3. Reported implementation rate of PAR agenda (p1) - Sub-indicator 3.1.6. Reported implementation of government commitments (criterion 1: Implementation rate of the annual government work plan (%)) - Sub-indicator 6.1.1. Effectiveness of policy implementation - Sub-indicator: 6.1.4. Application of administrative simplification measures (criterion 3: Simplification of administrative procedures/services in practice) - Sub-indicator 8.1.5. Quality of the disciplinary system (criterion 5: Disciplinary sanctions totally or partially revoked by the courts and independent appeal bodies) - Sub-indicator 8.1.6. Objectivity and fairness of dismissal and demotion of public servants performing public authority functions (criterion 6: Dismissal decisions due to reorganisation, disciplinary decisions and low performance totally or partially revoked by the courts and independent appeal bodies%) - Sub-indicator 8.1.6. Objectivity and fairness of dismissal and demotion of public servants performing public authority functions (criterion 7: Reported implementation rate of court decisions and independent appeal bodies decisions revoking totally or partially the dismissal of public servants (%)) - Sub-indicator 9.1.9. Efficiency and timeliness of recruitment procedures (criterion 4: Time required to hire a public servant) - Sub-indicator 15.1.4. Easiness of requesting and accessing public information (criterion 5: First instance denials to requests of access to public information across all central public administration which were overruled by the second instance administrative body and/or the courts (%)) - Sub-indicator 15.1.9. Proactivity in disclosure of information and data by state administration bodies - Sub-indicator 17.1.2. Timeliness of selected administrative procedures in practice (criteria 11-14) - Sub-indicator 20.1.1. Quality of selected administrative services - Sub-indicator 23.1.2. Preparation of the Medium-term fiscal framework (criterion 6: Credibility of the medium-term revenue forecasts (%)) - Sub-indicator 24.1.1. Efficiency of tax collection (criterion 1: Cost of tax collection ratio (%)) - Sub-indicator 24.1.7. Management of expenditure arrears - Sub-indicator 26.1.5. Reporting on internal control - Sub-indicator 29.1.1. Planning and preparation of the public procurement procedure (Criterion 2: At least 90% of contracts which were awarded in a given year had been previously announced in a procurement plan for a given year) Points are allocated based on the total average percentage of all selected sub-indicator/criterion scores as a percentage of their maximum available (x): • x < 5% = 0 points • 5% ≤ x < 95% = linear function • x ≥ 95% = 6 points.