Effectiveness of scrutiny of public authorities by independent oversight institutions
| ALB | BIH | XKV | MNE | MKD | SRB | AVG | BEST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.2 | 42.2 | 70 | 65.6 | 37.8 | 56.7 | 54.1 | 70 |
Effectiveness of scrutiny of public authorities by independent oversight institutions – at a glance
Average indicator values are presented for each area and administration. Click on the rows and columns to sort the table by highest value.
Category Performance
Each criterion belongs to one of five categories: 1) legislation, 2) strategy and guidance, 3) institutional set-up, 4) practice in implementation, and 5) results. The charts below show how the selected administration is performing in each category. The points received by the administration in each category during the assessment are divided by the total points that can be achieved in each category.
Compare performance
Pick a country and year above, and use the menu below to sort indicator values based on best or worst performance. Compare against the regional average, the best performer and past performance (if available).
Subindicators
List of subindicators within Effectiveness of scrutiny of public authorities by independent oversight institutions.
Parliamentary oversight of the government
Parliamentary support to the ombudsperson and the supreme audit institution (SAI)
Independence of the ombudsperson, capacities, and public trust
Requirements for the person appointed to the ombudsperson position
Mandate and powers of the ombudsperson
Implementation of ombudsperson recommendations
Independence of the state audit institution (SAI)
Capacities of the supreme audit institution (SAI) and public trust
Mandate and powers of the supreme audit institution (SAI)
Implementation of supreme audit institution (SAI) recommendations