Due process and good administrative behaviour when conducting administrative procedures and applying public authority
| ALB | BIH | XKV | MNE | MKD | SRB | AVG | BEST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.7 | 74.3 | 68.3 | 54.3 | 69.3 | 73.3 | 66.2 | 74.3 |
Due process and good administrative behaviour when conducting administrative procedures and applying public authority – at a glance
Average indicator values are presented for each area and administration. Click on the rows and columns to sort the table by highest value.
Category Performance
Each criterion belongs to one of five categories: 1) legislation, 2) strategy and guidance, 3) institutional set-up, 4) practice in implementation, and 5) results. The charts below show how the selected administration is performing in each category. The points received by the administration in each category during the assessment are divided by the total points that can be achieved in each category.
Compare performance
Pick a country and year above, and use the menu below to sort indicator values based on best or worst performance. Compare against the regional average, the best performer and past performance (if available).
Subindicators
List of subindicators within Due process and good administrative behaviour when conducting administrative procedures and applying public authority.
Due process in the legal framework regulating administrative procedures
Timeliness of administrative procedures
Public perception of the lawfulness and impartiality of administrative procedures
Business perception of the consistency and impartiality of conducting administrative procedures
Business perception of the consistency and impartiality of conducting administrative procedures
Functioning of administrative appeal
Monitoring the effectiveness of administrative procedures
Legal framework and application of the public liability regime