Efficiency, economy and competitiveness of public procurement operations
| ALB | BIH | XKV | MNE | MKD | SRB | AVG | BEST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95 | 43.8 | 58.8 | 92.5 | 81.3 | 92.5 | 77.3 | 95 |
Efficiency, economy and competitiveness of public procurement operations – at a glance
Average indicator values are presented for each area and administration. Click on the rows and columns to sort the table by highest value.
Category Performance
Each criterion belongs to one of five categories: 1) legislation, 2) strategy and guidance, 3) institutional set-up, 4) practice in implementation, and 5) results. The charts below show how the selected administration is performing in each category. The points received by the administration in each category during the assessment are divided by the total points that can be achieved in each category.
Compare performance
Pick a country and year above, and use the menu below to sort indicator values based on best or worst performance. Compare against the regional average, the best performer and past performance (if available).
Subindicators
List of subindicators within Efficiency, economy and competitiveness of public procurement operations.
Planning and preparation of the public procurement procedure
Share of competitive public procurement procedures
Efficiency of modern tools and techniques
Penetration of e-procurement
Quality of tender documents
The use of contract award criteria
Performance of public procurement market
Performance of PPPs/concessions market
Contract management
Contract management for PPPs/concessions
Ex post evaluation of the procurement process and of contract performance