Independence, effectiveness and competence of the review system
| ALB | BIH | XKV | MNE | MKD | SRB | AVG | BEST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 88.9 | 77.8 | 100 | 100 | 77.8 | 90.7 | 100 |
Independence, effectiveness and competence of the review system – at a glance
Average indicator values are presented for each area and administration. Click on the rows and columns to sort the table by highest value.
Category Performance
Each criterion belongs to one of five categories: 1) legislation, 2) strategy and guidance, 3) institutional set-up, 4) practice in implementation, and 5) results. The charts below show how the selected administration is performing in each category. The points received by the administration in each category during the assessment are divided by the total points that can be achieved in each category.
Compare performance
Pick a country and year above, and use the menu below to sort indicator values based on best or worst performance. Compare against the regional average, the best performer and past performance (if available).
Subindicators
List of subindicators within Independence, effectiveness and competence of the review system.
Mechanisms and procedures to challenge procurement decisions
Mechanisms and procedures to challenge decisions taken by contracting authorities as regards PPPs/concessions
Mechanisms and procedures to challenge decisions taken by contracting authorities as regards PPPs/concessions
The independence and responsibility of the review body and its members
The independence and responsibility of the review body for PPPs/concessions and its members
The independence and responsibility of the review body for PPPs/concessions and its members
Effectiveness of handling complaints by the review body and mechanisms to ensure implementation of its decisions
Effectiveness of handling complaints by the review body and mechanisms to ensure implementation of its decisions
Effectiveness of handling complaints by the review body and mechanisms to ensure implementation of its decisions for PPPs/concessions
Effectiveness of handling complaints by the review body and mechanisms to ensure implementation of its decisions for PPPs/concessions
Complaint submission in practice and fairness of fee rates for initiating review procedures
Complaint submission in practice and fairness of fee rates for initiating review procedures
Quality of decision making by the review body
Right to challenge decisions of the review body which is not judicial in character
Public availability and timeliness of data on the review system