Public availability and timeliness of data on the review system

The formal requirements for lodging complaints are published

Analysis of publicly available documentation. Relevant information about formal requirements for lodging complaints includes fees, forms, attachments etc.

All decisions of the review body are published on a central, public procurement website or a portal, accessible for free

Review of the website or portal for the publication of review body activities and decisions.

All decisions of the review body are published without delay, and no later than 14 days after their adoption

Review of the website or portal for the publication of review body activities and decisions.

All decisions of the review body are published with full rationale

Review of the website or portal for the publication of review body activities and decisions.

A website or a portal ensures access to the decisions of the review body through a comprehensive search engine

Review of the website or portal for the publication of review body activities and decisions. The search engine should offer search by various predefined criteria such as time period, type of procurement, the contracting authority, the applicant, legal provision and free text search for a specific situation or legal problem.

A website or a portal ensures access to the case law of the court or tribunal having jurisdiction in public procurement appeals

Review of the website or portal for the publication of court or tribunal activities and decisions. Search engine should offer search by various predefined criteria such as time period, the applicant, legal provision and free text search for a specific situation or legal problem.

Comprehensive data on the functioning of the review system are published on a central, public procurement website or a portal, accessible for free

Review of the website or portal for the publication of review body activities and decisions. Available information should include statistical data on the performance of the review system and reports on the work of the review body. Comprehensive data should at minimum include the following: 1. Number of received complaints, 2. Number of received complaints by specific phases of the public procurement procedure, 3. Number of cases resolved (dismissed, rejected, upheld, suspended), 4. Number of annulled decisions, procedures, and actions by the contracting authority due to irregularities, 5. Number of contracts or framework agreements declared ineffective, 6. Number of imposed fines and their amounts, 7. Average and median time for decision making, 8. Number of cases challenged in a court, 9. Most common reasons for filing complaints, 10. Most frequent irregularities identified by the review body, 11. Other relevant indicators in appeal cases, 12. Assessment of the state of legal protection and public procurement in general.