Public Service and Human Resource Management
Adequacy of the scope of public service

Adequacy of the scope of public service

This indicator measures the extent to which there is a legal framework establishing an adequate horizontal, vertical and material scope for the public service28, and whether it is consistently applied across the public sector.

Scope of public service - at a glance

Average indicator values are presented for each area and country. Click on the rows and columns to sort the table by highest value, or “show progress” to include trends over time.
ALB XKV MNE MKD SRB UKR AVG
Clarity of scope of the civil service
50
50
100
100
100
50
80
Adequacy of horizontal scope
83.33
66.67
83.33
66.67
66.67
100
73.33
Exclusion of politically appointed positions
100
100
100
0
100
100
80
Clarity of lower division line
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Material scope of the legislation
100
100
100
100
100
100
100

Compare performance

Pick a country and year above, and use the menu below to sort subindicator values based on best or worst performance. Compare against the regional average, the highest performer and past performance.

Western Balkans
Highest Value
2017

Albania, 2021

Clarity of scope of the civil service Adequacy of horizontal scope Exclusion of politically appointed positions Clarity of lower division line Material scope of the legislation

Most significant change

Green bars show the subindicator values that advanced most. Red bars shows those that deteriorated most. Only subindicator values that have changed are shown.

Albania from 2017 to 2021

Adequacy of horizontal scope Clarity of scope of the civil service