Public Service and Human Resource Management
Quality of disciplinary procedures for civil servants

Quality of disciplinary procedures for civil servants

This indicator measures the extent to which the legal framework and the organisation of disciplinary procedures support individual accountability, professionalism and integrity of civil servants and safeguard civil servants against unfair and arbitrary disciplinary cases.

Fair disciplinary procedures - at a glance

Average indicator values are presented for each area and country. Click on the rows and columns to sort the table by highest value, or “show progress” to include trends over time.
ALB XKV MNE MKD SRB UKR AVG
Fair disciplinary principles
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Fair disciplinary procedures
100
100
100
0
100
100
80
Prescription period
100
100
75
50
50
50
75
Suspension-legal guarantees
50
50
100
50
100
50
70
Sanctions confirmed by courts (%)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Compare performance

Pick a country and year above, and use the menu below to sort subindicator values based on best or worst performance. Compare against the regional average, the highest performer and past performance.

Western Balkans
Highest Value
2017

Albania, 2021

Fair disciplinary principles Fair disciplinary procedures Prescription period Suspension-legal guarantees Sanctions confirmed by courts (%)

Most significant change

Green bars show the subindicator values that advanced most. Red bars shows those that deteriorated most. Only subindicator values that have changed are shown.

Albania from 2017 to 2021

Suspension-legal guarantees