Value for money, free competition, transparency, equal treatment, mutual recognition and proportionality for PPPs/concessions
Expert review of legislation and documents describing the system of public procurement in the country.
Interviews with the central institution responsible for the PPPs/concessions regulatory framework, contracting authorities, economic operators and their associations, PPP experts and NGOs.
For each of the following eight criteria, 1 point is awarded (total of 8 points).
Criteria fulfilled: 7/8
Yes
No
No data available / not assessed
| The scope of PPP/concessions regulations is harmonised with the definition of contracting authorities in Directive 2014/23 (1 point) | |
| The list of exclusions does not go beyond the permitted exclusions in EU Directives (1 point) | |
| The contracting authority/entity is obliged by law to use competitive procedures (launched by a notice) for PPP/concessions awards (1 point) | |
| The contracting authority/entity is obliged by law to inform each candidate and tenderer of decisions reached, including the grounds for any decision (1 point) | |
| Legislation includes provisions for preventing potential and managing actual conflicts of interest (1 point) | |
| According to the legal provisions, the contracting authority/entity has to abide by the rules announced in the tender documentation (1 point) | |
| Provisions regulating preparation of technical specifications, clear and non-discriminatory award criteria, and clear and non-discriminatory grounds of exclusion and selection criteria ensure equal access of economic operators to the contract (1 point) | |
| Legal provisions do not restrict access to professional knowledge and expert support in the preparation of tender documentation or during the negotiation process for contracting authorities/entities (1 point) |