Adequacy of the policy, legal framework and institutional set-up for professional human resource management in public service

This indicator measures the extent to which the policy, legal framework and institutional capacities are in place and enable consistent human resource management (HRM) practices across the public service, and assesses whether policies and laws are implemented to ensure proper management of the civil service, for example a functioning civil service database, availability and use of data, etc.

Policy and institutional framework for HRM - at a glance

Average indicator values are presented for each area and country. Click on the rows and columns to sort the table by highest value, or “show progress” to include trends over time.
ALB XKV MNE MKD SRB UKR AVG
Political responsibility
0
100
100
100
100
0
80
Quality of policy documents
87.5
87.5
0
75
100
75
70
Implementation and monitoring of policy
25
25
75
25
25
75
35
Existence of a central, capable co-ordination body
87.5
62.5
75
75
62.5
100
72.5
Professionalism of HRM units
50
0
0
50
0
100
20
HRM information system
37.5
50
0
62.5
0
75
30
Availability and use of data
100
40
60
40
60
40
60
Balance between primary and secondary legislation
100
100
0
100
100
100
80

Compare performance

Pick a country and year above, and use the menu below to sort subindicator values based on best or worst performance. Compare against the regional average, the highest performer and past performance.

Western Balkans
Highest Value
2017

Albania, 2021

Political responsibility Quality of policy documents Implementation and monitoring of policy Existence of a central, capable co-ordination body Professionalism of HRM units HRM information system Availability and use of data Balance between primary and secondary legislation

Most significant change

Green bars show the subindicator values that advanced most. Red bars shows those that deteriorated most. Only subindicator values that have changed are shown.

Albania from 2017 to 2021

Availability and use of data Existence of a central, capable co-ordination body Quality of policy documents Political responsibility