Professional development and training for civil servants

This indicator measures the extent to which the legal framework and the organisation of training, performance appraisal, mobility and promotion support fair professional development in the civil service.

Professional development - at a glance

Average indicator values are presented for each area and country. Click on the rows and columns to sort the table by highest value, or “show progress” to include trends over time.
ALB XKV MNE MKD SRB UKR AVG
Training as a right and duty
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Co-ordination of training
100
100
66.67
66.67
100
100
86.67
Training planning
66.67
66.67
66.67
0
100
100
60
Training evaluation
50
50
100
0
100
100
60
Performance assessment
75
75
50
75
75
50
70
Consequences of performance assessment
100
100
0
0
100
0
60
Clarity of mobility criteria
100
100
100
50
50
100
80
Regulation of promotion
100
100
0
100
50
100
70
Politicisation of promotion
100
0
0
0
0
0
20
Right to appeal performance appraisal
100
100
100
100
100
50
100
Right to appeal mobility
100
100
100
100
100
0
100
Training budget
0
0
50
0
0
0
10
Civil servants trained (%)
20
0
0
0
20
40
8
Perception of meritocracy
80
60
40
60
60
0
60

Compare performance

Pick a country and year above, and use the menu below to sort subindicator values based on best or worst performance. Compare against the regional average, the highest performer and past performance.

Western Balkans
Highest Value
2017

Albania, 2021

Training as a right and duty Co-ordination of training Training planning Training evaluation Performance assessment Consequences of performance assessment Clarity of mobility criteria Regulation of promotion Politicisation of promotion Right to appeal performance appraisal Right to appeal mobility Training budget Civil servants trained (%) Perception of meritocracy

Most significant change

Green bars show the subindicator values that advanced most. Red bars shows those that deteriorated most. Only subindicator values that have changed are shown.

Albania from 2017 to 2021

Performance assessment Perception of meritocracy Training planning Training evaluation Training budget